🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy worked, and disclosed fresh requests had come from intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Path

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions resume.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the conference, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be ended by armed force. He said the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Primary Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had always tried to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the ultimate solution to settle conflicts, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this invasion."